09.05.08

God on trial

Posted in Religion at 7:57 am by Anthony

God was on trial on BBC 2 the other night. In a very interesting drama prisoners in Auschwitz, who were scheduled for the gas chamber, put God on trial on the charge that he had broken his covenant with his chosen people by allowing such barbarity to take place.

The trial was interrupted from time to time to show us a group of modern day tourists visiting the death camp site. The tourist group included young and old and, I think, a survivor of Auschwitz.

Although, as I say, the drama was interesting and God was found guilty in the end, it really was nothing more than a propaganda piece in favour of the hypocrisy and stark contradictions present in all religions.

For example; one God defender, when asked why the horror was allowed argued that it was a plan by God, that it was a punishment for human wrongdoing. It was even suggested that Hitler and his Nazis were created by God to carry out his plan, that they were his tools.

Later, a prosecution witness asked if God was all powerful why did he allow such horror to occur. Effectively, the same question as above but this time there was a completely different and contradictory answer.

Free Will; He gave us free will to make our own choices and we choose to do evil. In this case it wasn’t God’s plan; it was simply bad human behaviour over which God had no control.

This is completely illogical. Apparently, we are to accept that God made humans in such a way that they were unable to stop themselves from doing wrong and then devised a plan designed to punish them for doing wrong. Even worse, he ruthlessly punished and destroyed those who had committed minor or no crimes at all, like small children.

Towards the end, when the Nazis came to take the men away to die, we saw the most anti God character break down and plead for help – he was told by the (serene) pro God side to pray.

The impression given was that those who challenge God are only confident in their beliefs when they are safe from the immediate fear of death. This is a dishonest portrayal. Many humans who have no belief whatsoever face torture and death with great courage.

On several occasions throughout the drama the pro God side stated that Hitler would die, the war would end but that the Torah, God and his chosen people would live on. This, I believe, was the central message the writer of the drama wanted to convey.

No matter what happened here on earth, no matter how mysterious and unjust God’s actions seemed to be, no matter what suffering the innocent were forced to endure – All would be well in the end so long as humans retained their blind faith in God.

08.19.08

Out talking the witnesses

Posted in Religion at 4:58 pm by Anthony

My nephew, Gavin, introduced me to a brilliant website recently. It’s called TED which stands for Technology, Entertainment, Design. The site brings together the worlds most fascinating thinkers and doers to give a talk on a wide range of subjects.

Last night I listened to author, philosopher and journalist, A.J Jacobs talking about the year he lived biblically – following the rules in the Bible as literally as possible. I’m not really a great fan of this kind of thing where a writer self-generates the subject matter of a book.

Some years ago a couple of Irish writers did something similar when they wrote a series of crazy letters to various business, political and religious leaders and produced a book based on the replies - I just don’t get the point.

During his year living biblically Jacobs had many encounters with a whole range of different religions. Hilariously, he claimed that he must be the only person in America to have a Jehovah Witness run away from him because their discussion went on too long.

I think I can make the same claim for Ireland. Some years ago I was visited by two Jehovah Witnesses and we got into a deep but enjoyable discussion on a whole range of religious topics.

Although I’m agnostic I’m very interested in the whole phenomenon of religion, its origins, how it affects people, nations and history. I particularly like to challenge religious opinions makers and evangelists.

As usual, only one of the duo engaged in discussion, the other just observed and listened. However, after a good half hour of intense discussion, the ‘silent one’ could take no more and let loose a tirade.

“Look, we’ve visited every house in this estate and I know they’re all Catholics but every one of them agreed with us on at least some points. You haven’t agreed on even the smallest point, you are completely unreasonable…”

Keeping in mind the golden rule – If you lose your temper, you’ve lost the argument, I courteously asked the man to wait until I had finished my point but clearly he had had enough and began to drag his protesting colleague away - They haven’t been back since.


View My Stats